|
|
Commercial Insight: Rheumatoid arthritis - Anti-TNFs defend first-line biologic position despite competition
|
|||||||||||
| Preis** (Lieferformat): |
Versandkostenfrei ** WICHTIG: Alle Preise sind netto ausgewiesen. Abhängig von Versand- und Leistungsort ist hierauf noch USt. zu entrichten (Deutschland z.Z. 19%). Der korrekte Gesamtendpreis wird Ihnen mit der Angabe Ihrer Rechnungsadresse, USt-ID-Nr. etc. im Bestellverlauf ausgewiesen. Weitere Informationen zu den Bestandteilen des Kaufpreises finden Sie in unseren FAQs. |
|||||||||||
| Zahlen und Fakten zur Studie: |
*Quantify the current size of rheumatoid arthritis sales in the seven major markets and understand trends in the Rest of World *Assess the commercial opportunities for non-anti-TNF biologic products including Orencia, Rituxan/MabThera, Actemra, ocrelizumab and ofatumumab *Detailed case studies analysing Simponi's product positioning and epidemiology-based assessment of biologic therapies by line and type of therapy 272 pages | |||||||||||
| Inhalt der Studie: |
Datamonitor forecasts that total sales for the seven major rheumatoid arthritis markets will grow from $7 billion in 2007 to over $12 billion in 2017. The sustained uptake of anti-TNFs combined with t.....
Datamonitor forecasts that total sales for the seven major rheumatoid arthritis markets will grow from $7 billion in 2007 to over $12 billion in 2017. The sustained uptake of anti-TNFs combined with the launch of several new biologic products will drive growth in the short-and mid-term. However, biosimilar entry will cause a small contraction in market value at the end of the forecast period. Report Highlights Simponi (golimumab) exemplifies a brand adopting both follow-on and dual formulation strategies, but positioning with Remicade will be challenging. Careful brand management, sales and marketing efforts and a well executed switching strategy will see Simponi achieve blockbuster status in the seven major markets. The TNF-failure pool will increase considerably as patients cycle through a maximum of 2-3 TNF therapies. Currently, Orencia and Rituxan/MabThera compete in this sub-population, which will become increasingly crowded. With its well-perceived safety profile and Actemra's US approval delay, Orencia will cement its first-line position in TNF-failures. Although some novel biologic products, have amassed convincing efficacy data against anti-TNFs, their use will be limited to the anti-TNF failure patient population, at least in the mid-term. To progress up the treatment algorithm, new agents need to demonstrate superiority to anti-TNFs and show cost-effectiveness. [Studien Infos ausblenden] |
|||||||||||
|
ABOUT DATAMONITOR HEALTHCARE 2 About the Immunology & Inflammation pharmaceutical analysis team 2 CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Strategic scoping and focus 3 Datamonitor insight into the disease market 3 Related reports 5 CHAPTER 2 MARKET DEFINITION 7 Market definition for this report 7 Biologic DMARDs 7 TNF inhibitors 7 Interleukins 8 Selective T cell co-stimulation modulator 8 B cell targets 9 Traditional DMARDs (non-biologic DMARDs) 9 ICD-10 codes used to define the rheumatoid arthritis market 11 Assumptions and caveats for diagnosis value estimates 12 Diagnosis value based on retail data only 12 CHAPTER 3 MARKET OVERVIEW 14 Seven major markets 14 Current and future market assessment 14 TNF inhibitors drove growth in the seven major rheumatoid arthritis markets between 2004 and 2007 14 Launch of two new biologic classes contributed to growth in the rheumatoid arthritis market between 2004 and 2007 16 US is the largest rheumatoid arthritis market, but 5EU and Japan experienced higher sales growth between 2004 and 2007 17 Rheumatoid arthritis market volume is increasing, but due to the uptake of biologics, sales growth is outstripping it 18 The seven rheumatoid arthritis markets will grow from $7,245m in 2007 to $12,568m in 2017 19 Opportunities and threats 24 Opportunities 24 Threats 30 US 38 Current and future market assessment 38 US experienced the lowest sales growth between 2004 and 2007 38 US will continue to be the largest of the seven rheumatoid arthritis markets 40 Opportunities and threats 44 Opportunities 44 Threats 45 Japan 46 Current and future market assessment 46 Japan was the fastest growing market from 2004 to 2007 46 2017 rheumatoid arthritis sales in Japan will be almost double sales in 2007 49 Opportunities and threats 53 Opportunities 53 Threats 53 Five major European markets (5EU) 55 Current and future market assessment 55 Opportunities and threats 62 Opportunities 62 Threats 64 France 66 Current and future market assessment 66 Germany 70 Current and future market assessment 70 Italy 74 Current and future market assessment 74 Spain 78 Current and future market assessment 78 UK 82 Current and future market assessment 82 Rest of World snapshot 86 Current market assessment 86 Rest of World forms only 15% of global rheumatoid arthritis market sales 86 Humira's sales drove growth in US, 5EU and the rest of world from 2004 to 2007 87 Asia-Pacific experienced the fastest growth in the Rest of World between 2004 and 2007 88 Canada is the largest of the Rest of World markets 89 CHAPTER 4 BRAND DYNAMICS 91 Overview of competitive landscape 91 Patient acquisition process 93 Introduction 93 Patient care path 93 Points of influence in the patient care path 95 Trigger Point 1: Disease duration and activity influence use of biologics 95 Trigger Point 2: Movement from anti-TNFs to biologics with alternative mechanisms of action 96 Drivers of brand choice 97 Disease modification and side-effects are the most important factors to prescribing physicians 97 Factors driving brand choice in the anti-TNF class 100 Patient preference can influence anti-TNF choice 100 Patients wish to participate in treatment decisions regarding anti-TNFs 102 Factors driving brand choice in the cytokine drug class 104 Similar choice between anti-TNFs and cytokines 104 US formulary status for leading brands 104 Enbrel has the most favorable formulary status of the biologic DMARDs 105 Trends in marketing strategies 106 Datamonitor's dosing assumptions for brand forecasts 107 TNF inhibitors 108 Efficacy of TNF inhibitors 108 Safety of TNF inhibitors 111 TNF inhibitors - sales forecast to 2017 112 Enbrel (etanercept; Amgen, Wyeth, Takeda) 114 Product profile 114 Product positioning 115 Marketing mix 119 SWOT analysis 122 Brand forecast to 2017 123 Remicade (infliximab; Centocor/Johnson & Johnson, Schering-Plough and Mitsubishi Tanabe) 125 Product profile 125 Product positioning 126 Marketing mix 129 SWOT analysis 130 Brand forecast to 2017 131 Humira (adalimumab; Abbott, Eisai) 133 Product profile 133 Product positioning 134 Marketing mix 135 Brand forecast to 2017 138 Simponi (golimumab; Centocor/Johnson & Johnson, Schering-Plough, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Janssen Pharmaceutical) 140 Target product profile 141 Development overview 141 Product positioning 143 SWOT analysis 147 Drug forecast to 2017 148 Cimzia (certolizumab; UCB, Otsuka) 150 Target product profile 151 Development overview 152 Product positioning 156 Marketing mix 159 SWOT analysis 160 Drug forecast to 2017 161 Other cytokine targets (non-TNF biologics) 164 Other cytokine targets - sales forecast to 2017 164 Actemra (tocilizumab; Chugai, Roche) 166 Product profile 167 Development overview 168 Product positioning 172 SWOT analysis 175 Brand forecast to 2017 176 Orencia (abatacept; Bristol-Myers Squibb) 179 Product profile 180 Product positioning 181 Marketing mix 189 SWOT analysis 190 Brand forecast to 2017 191 Rituxan/MabThera (rituximab; Genentech, Biogen Idec, Roche and Chugai) 196 Product profile 197 Product positioning 198 SWOT analysis 200 Brand forecast to 2017 201 Ocrelizumab (Genentech, Biogen Idec, Roche and Chugai) 203 Target product profile 203 Development overview 204 Product positioning 205 SWOT analysis 206 Brand forecast to 2017 206 Ofatumumab (Genmab, GlaxoSmithKline) 209 Target product profile 210 Product positioning 210 SWOT analysis 215 Brand forecast to 2017 215 Other promising late-stage pipeline agents 218 JAK inhibitors 218 CHAPTER 5 KEY DEVELOPERS 220 Strategic overview 220 Trends in corporate strategy 222 Several companies will enter the market with follow-on products 222 Companies are going for dual subcutaneous and intravenous delivery formulations 223 Amgen 223 Corporate strategy 223 Rheumatoid arthritis portfolio assessment 225 Roche 227 Corporate strategy 227 Rheumatoid arthritis portfolio assessment 228 Bristol-Myers Squibb 230 Corporate strategy 230 Rheumatoid arthritis portfolio assessment 231 CHAPTER 6 CASE STUDIES 233 Case study 1 - Patient-based rheumatoid arthritis market forecasts 233 Comparison between patient-based forecast and IMS forecast 233 Methodology 235 Sensitivity analysis 238 Case study 2 - Portfolio management: Simponi's (golimumab) positioning strategy 239 Scenario A - Immediate switch to subcutaneous formulation 239 Scenario B - Delayed switch to intravenous formulation 241 Conclusion - Scenario B benefits Simponi and anti-TNF franchise 243 Simponi (golimumab, CNTO-148) pricing scenarios 244 BIBLIOGRAPHY 247 Journal papers 247 Websites 252 Datamonitor reports 256 Publications 256 APPENDIX A - MARKET ASSUMPTIONS 258 New product launches 258 Patent expiries 258 US 258 Arava (leflunomide) used as a case study for brand erosion after small molecule patent expiry in the US 258 Data definitions, limitations and assumptions 259 Standard units 259 Japanese market data 259 Rest of World 259 Derivation of sales forecasts and pricing trends 260 Forecast methodology 260 APPENDIX B 261 Contributing experts 261 Report methodology 261 About Datamonitor 262 About Datamonitor Healthcare 262 About the Immunology & Inflammation analysis team 263 Disclaimer 264 [Inhaltsverzeichnis ausblenden] |
||||||||||||
|
Table 1: Datamonitor's definition of rheumatoid arthritis 11 Table 2: Rheumatologist breakdown by region for IMS Prescribing Insight data, 2007 13 Table 3: Rheumatoid-arthritis specific sales ($m) split by drug class in the seven major markets, 2004-07 16 Table 4: Rheumatoid arthritis-specific volume sales (million standard units) split by drug class in the seven major markets, 2004-07 19 Table 5: Sales forecasts in rheumatoid arthritis in the seven major markets ($m), 2007-2017 22 Table 6: Patent expiry dates and level of biosimilar risk for the biologic brands for rheumatoid arthritis 33 Table 7: Cost ($) per year per patient for common biologic agents prescribed for rheumatoid arthritis in the US, 2007 36 Table 8: Summary of opportunities and threats in the seven major rheumatoid arthritis markets, 2008 38 Table 9: Sales and growth of rheumatoid arthritis drug classes in the US, 2007 39 Table 10: Sales forecasts in rheumatoid arthritis in US ($m), 2007-2017 42 Table 11: Summary of opportunities and threats in the rheumatoid arthritis market in the US, 2007 46 Table 12: Japan sales and growth of anti-TNF and traditional DMARD drug classes, 2007 47 Table 13: Sales forecasts in rheumatoid arthritis in Japan ($m), 2007-2017 51 Table 14: Summary of opportunities and threats in the rheumatoid arthritis market in Japan, 2007 55 Table 15: Sales of the Top-10 rheumatoid arthritis drugs in the five major EU markets ($m), 2007 57 Table 16: Sales forecasts for rheumatoid arthritis in the five major European markets ($m), 2007-2017 60 Table 17: Summary of opportunities and threats for rheumatoid arthritis in the five major European markets, 2008 66 Table 18: Sales forecasts in rheumatoid arthritis in France ($m), 2007-2017 68 Table 19: Sales forecasts in rheumatoid arthritis in Germany ($m), 2007-2017 72 Table 20: Sales forecasts in rheumatoid arthritis in Italy ($m), 2007-2017 76 Table 21: Sales forecasts in rheumatoid arthritis in Spain ($m), 2007-2017 80 Table 22: Sales forecasts in rheumatoid arthritis in the UK ($m), 2007-2017 84 Table 23: Comparison of leading branded drug sales ($m) for rheumatoid arthritis in the seven major markets and the Rest of World (ROW), 2007 88 Table 24: Leading branded drug sales ($m) for rheumatoid arthritis, 2007-2017 92 Table 25: Key products in late-stage R&D pipeline for rheumatoid arthritis, 2008 93 Table 26: Mean scores for considerations in choosing biologic response modifier therapy for rheumatoid arthritis, 2008 99 Table 27: Summary of patient preferences regarding anti-TNF therapy, showing first choices only 101 Table 28: Factors influencing prescribing decision for anti-TNFs and cytokine biologics in rheumatoid arthritis in the seven major markets, 2008 104 Table 29: Formulary status in the US for leading brands in rheumatoid arthritis, 2008 105 Table 30: Datamonitor's standard unit definition and dosing assumptions for marketed and pipeline products in rheumatoid arthritis market, 2008 107 Table 31: Efficacy of the anti-TNFs: American College of Rheumatology 20, 50 and 70 110 Table 32: Safety of TNF inhibitors, 2008 112 Table 33: Enbrel - Drug profile, 2008 114 Table 34: Ongoing and recently completed clinical trials of Enbrel (etanercept) in juvenile idiopathic rheumatoid arthritis, 2008 118 Table 35: Impacting factors on the revenues of Enbrel, 2007-2017 124 Table 36: Remicade - Drug profile, 2008 125 Table 37: Ongoing post-marketing studies for Remicade in rheumatoid arthritis, 2008 127 Table 38: Impacting factors on the revenues of Remicade, 2007-2017 133 Table 39: Humira - Drug profile, 2008 134 Table 40: Impacting factors on the revenues of Humira, 2007-2017 140 Table 41: Simponi - Target product profile, 2008 141 Table 42: Clinical trial summary for subcutaneous formulation of Simponi (golimumab) 142 Table 43: Clinical trial summary for intravenous formulation of Simponi (golimumab), 2008 143 Table 44: Simponi (golimumab) efficacy summary: Clinical trial data from GO-FORWARD, GO-AFTER and GO-BEFORE, 2008 144 Table 45: Comparison of the route of administration and dosing frequency of the anti-TNFs in rheumatoid arthritis 146 Table 46: Impacting factors on the revenues of Simponi (golimumab), 2007-2017 150 Table 47: Cimzia- Target product profile, 2008 152 Table 48: Cimzia (certolizumab): Pivotal Phase III clinical trials 153 Table 49: Cimzia (certolizumab): Ongoing clinical trials, 2008 154 Table 50: Results of Cimzia's RAPID-1 and RAPID-2 clinical trials 156 Table 51: Impacting factors on the revenues of Cimzia, 2007-2017 163 Table 52: Actemra - Drug profile, 2008 168 Table 53: Actemra (tocilizumab): Pivotal Phase III trials 169 Table 54: Actemra (tocilizumab): summary of results from pivotal Phase III trials OPTION, TOWARD, RADIATE and AMBITION 170 Table 55: LITHE study results: Inhibition of radiographic progression at Week 52 171 Table 56: Actemra (tocilizumab): summary of results from SAMURAI and SATORI trials 171 Table 57: Impacting factors on the revenues of Actemra, 2007-2017 179 Table 58: Orencia - Drug profile, 2008 180 Table 59: Completed Phase III clinical trials for Orencia (abatacept) 182 Table 60: Ongoing clinical trials for Orencia (abatacept) in rheumatoid arthritis, 2008 183 Table 61: The efficacy of abatacept in methotrexate-naïve patients with early erosive rheumatoid arthritis and poor prognostic factors, 2008 185 Table 62: Phase IIIb studies for subcutaneous formulation of Orencia (abatacept), 2008 188 Table 63: Impacting factors on the revenues of Orencia, 2007-2017 196 Table 64: Rituxan/MabThera - Drug profile, 2008 197 Table 65: Comparison of ACR efficacy scores in the TNF-failure patient population: Rituxan/MabThera versus Orencia 198 Table 66: Impacting factors on the revenues of Rituxan/MabThera, 2007-2017 203 Table 67: Ocrelizumab - Drug profile, 2008 204 Table 68: Ocrelizumab ACR efficacy data from Phase II ACTION trial, 2007 204 Table 69: Ocrelizumab Phase III clinical trial details, 2008 205 Table 70: Impacting factors on the revenues of ocrelizumab, 2007-2017 208 Table 71: Ofatumumab - Drug profile, 2008 210 Table 72: Comparison of ofatumumab versus rituximab, 2008 211 Table 73: Ofatumumab's ACR and EULAR efficacy scores in DMARD-failure patients, 2007 211 Table 74: Efficacy of ofatumumab in DMARD-failure patients: 48 Week follow-up, 2008 212 Table 75: Ofatumumab: Ongoing Phase III and Phase II clinical trials, 2008 214 Table 76: Impacting factors on the revenues of ofatumumab, 2007-2017 217 Table 77: JAK inhibitors in development for rheumatoid arthritis, 2008 218 Table 78: CP-690,550: Phase IIb efficacy data, 2008 219 Table 79: Leading companies in the seven major rheumatoid arthritis markets, 2007-17 221 Table 80: Assessment of Amgen's rheumatoid arthritis portfolio, 2008 226 Table 81: Assessment of Roche's rheumatoid arthritis portfolio, 2008 229 Table 82: Assessment of Bristol-Myers Squibb's rheumatoid arthritis portfolio, 2008 232 Table 83: Scenario A: Simponi's US events and market share assumptions from launch in 2009 240 Table 84: Scenario B: Simponi's events and market share assumptions from launch 242 Table 85: Centocor/Johnson & Johnson's anti-TNF franchise sales in rheumatoid arthritis in the US, 2007-17 244 Table 86: Datamonitor's pricing scenarios for Simponi in the US, 2008 245 Table 87: Datamonitor's launch dates for rheumatoid arthritis products in the 5EU and US, 2007-2017 258 Table 88: Arava's brand erosion from time of first generic entrant, Q2 2005 to Q2 2007 259 Figure 1: Rheumatoid arthritis sales ($m) by drug class in the seven major markets, 2004-07 15 Figure 2: Key events impacting the rheumatoid arthritis market, 2005-08 17 Figure 3: Sales performance of the US, five major EU and Japan rheumatoid arthritis markets, 2006-07 18 Figure 4: Rheumatoid arthritis-specific sales ($m) by country, 2004-2017 21 Figure 5: Rheumatoid arthritis sales in the seven major markets, split by country, 2007-17 24 Figure 6: Number of rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving anti-TNF and non-TNF biologics in the seven major markets, 2007-17 29 Figure 7: Rheumatoid arthritis sales ($m) by drug class in US, 2004-07 39 Figure 8: US rheumatoid arthritis-specific sales by class, 2004-17 41 Figure 9: Rheumatoid arthritis-specific sales split by class in Japan ($m), 2004-07 47 Figure 10: Rheumatoid arthritis-specific of Remicade (infliximab) and Enbrel (etanercept), 2004-07 48 Figure 11: Performance of the key rheumatoid arthritis therapies in Japan ($m), 2005-2006 49 Figure 12: Japan rheumatoid arthritis-specific sales by class, 2004-17 50 Figure 13: Price per standard unit ($/SU) for Remicade (infliximab) in Japan, Q1 2007-Q2 2008 54 Figure 14: Rheumatoid arthritis-specific sales split by class in the 5EU ($m), 2004-07 56 Figure 15: Five major EU rheumatoid arthritis-specific sales by class, 2004-17 58 Figure 16: Five major EU rheumatoid arthritis-specific sales by class, 2004-17 59 Figure 17: France rheumatoid arthritis-specific sales by class, 2004-17 67 Figure 18: Germany rheumatoid arthritis-specific sales by class, 2004-17 71 Figure 19: Italy rheumatoid arthritis-specific sales by class, 2004-17 75 Figure 20: Spain rheumatoid arthritis-specific sales by class, 2004-17 79 Figure 21: Rheumatoid arthritis-specific sales split by class in UK ($m), 2004-07 83 Figure 22: Rest of World versus seven major market sales split in the rheumatoid arthritis market ($m), 2007 87 Figure 23: Annual sales ($m) in the Rest of World rheumatoid arthritis markets, split by region, 2004-07 89 Figure 24: Sales value of the largest 10 individual rheumatoid arthritis markets in the Rest of World, 2004-07 90 Figure 25: Rheumatoid arthritis patient care path, 2008 94 Figure 26: Drivers of brand choice for rheumatoid arthritis, 2008 98 Figure 27: Percentage of responses to question about who should choose treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis 103 Figure 28: Assessment of formulary status of leading biologic DMARDS in the US, 2008 106 Figure 29: Rheumatoid arthritis sales ($m) for TNF inhibitors in the seven major markets, 2004-17 113 Figure 30: Type of promotional activity for Enbrel as a percentage of total promotional spend in the US and five major EU markets, Q3 2005-Q2 2008 120 Figure 31: Wyeth/Amgen's advertisement for Enbrel in juvenile idiopathic arthritis from the ACR Scientific Meeting, 2008 121 Figure 32: Enbrel (etanercept): SWOT analysis, 2008 122 Figure 33: Enbrel sales ($m) in rheumatoid arthritis by country in the seven major markets, 2007-2017 124 Figure 34: Type of promotional activity for Remicade as a percentage of promotional spend in the US and five major EU markets, Q3 2005-Q2 2008 130 Figure 35: Remicade (infliximab): SWOT analysis, 2008 131 Figure 36: Remicade sales ($m) in rheumatoid arthritis by country in the seven major markets, 2007-2017 132 Figure 37: Type of promotional activity for Humira as a percentage of total promotional spend in the US and five major EU markets, Q3 2005-Q2 2008 137 Figure 38: Humira (adalimumab): SWOT analysis, 2008 138 Figure 39: Humira (adalimumab) sales ($m) by country in the seven major markets, 2007-17 139 Figure 40: Simponi (golimumab): SWOT analysis, 2008 148 Figure 41: Simponi (golimumab) sales ($m) by country in the seven major markets, 2007-17 149 Figure 42: Type of promotional activity for Cimzia as a percentage of total promotional spend in the US, Q2 2008 160 Figure 43: Cimzia (certolizumab): SWOT analysis, 2008 161 Figure 44: Cimzia sales ($m) in rheumatoid arthritis by country in the seven major markets, 2007-2017 162 Figure 45: Rheumatoid arthritis sales ($m) for other cytokine targets in the seven major markets, 2074-17 165 Figure 46: Actemra (tocilizumab): SWOT analysis, 2008 176 Figure 47: Actemra sales ($m) in rheumatoid arthritis by country in the seven major markets, 2007-2017 178 Figure 48: Promotional activity for Orencia by type as a percentage of promotional spend the US and EU (France, Germany, UK), Q3 2005-Q2 2008 190 Figure 49: Orencia (abatacept): SWOT analysis, 2008 191 Figure 50: Orencia sales ($m), split by formulation, in rheumatoid arthritis in the seven major markets, 2007-2017 192 Figure 51: Orencia sales ($m) in rheumatoid arthritis by country in the seven major markets, 2007-2017 194 Figure 52: Orencia, Rituxan/MabThera and Actemra sales ($m) in rheumatoid arthritis in the seven major markets, 2007-2017 195 Figure 53: Rituxan/MabThera (rituximab): SWOT analysis, 2008 200 Figure 54: Rituxan/MabThera sales ($m) in rheumatoid arthritis by country in the seven major markets, 2007-2017 202 Figure 55: Ocrelizumab: SWOT analysis, 2008 206 Figure 56: Ocrelizumab sales ($m) in rheumatoid arthritis by country in the seven major markets, 2007-2017 208 Figure 57: Rituxan/MabThera (rituximab) and ocrelizumab sales ($m) in rheumatoid arthritis in the seven major markets, 2007-2017 209 Figure 58: Ofatumumab: SWOT analysis, 2008 215 Figure 59: Ofatumumab sales ($m) in rheumatoid arthritis by country in the seven major markets, 2007-2017 216 Figure 60: Ofatumumab sales ($m), split by formulation, in rheumatoid arthritis in the seven major markets, 2007-2017 217 Figure 61: Overview of key players with marketed and pipeline drugs in rheumatoid arthritis market, 2008 222 Figure 62: Estimated number of patients treated with biologics split by line and type of therapy, 2006-17 234 Figure 63: Estimated rheumatoid arthritis sales ($m) forecast for biologic brands in the seven major markets, 2006-17 235 Figure 64: Estimated uptake of biologics in moderate and severe rheumatoid arthritis patients in the seven major markets, 2006-17 236 Figure 65: Datamonitor's estimated percentage of patients receiving biologics, by type of therapy, at each line of therapy in 2007 and 2017 238 Figure 66: Datamonitor's sensitivity analysis for biologic sales ($m) in rheumatoid arthritis in the seven major markets, 2017 239 Figure 67: Simponi's rheumatoid arthritis sales in the US assuming an immediate switch from Remicade to subcutaneous Simponi formulation, 2007-17 241 Figure 68: Simponi's rheumatoid arthritis sales in the US assuming a delayed switch from Remicade to intravenous Simponi formulation, 2007-17 243 Figure 69: Simponi's rheumatoid arthritis sales under each pricing scenario in the US, 2007-17 246 [Tabellenverzeichnis ausblenden] |
||||||||||||
| Hinweis: | * Der Rechnungsbetrag für diese Studie wird in $ (Dollar) ausgewiesen. Kunden aus dem Inland bekommen von uns eine Rechnung in Euro, umgerechnet zum letztwöchigen Schlusskurs | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||


