SUMMARY 1
Impact 1
Ovum View 1
Key Messages 2
Cost-to-serve is a utilities-specific version of activity-based management 2
ABM is not easy to implement 2
IT plays a big part in the successful implementation of activity-based management 2
A utility's approach to cost-to-serve is very different for commercial and residential customers 2
Cost-to-serve analysis helps utilities to improve business processes and reduce costs 2
Segmenting customers into clusters of similar cost-to-serve can improve profitability 2
By analyzing interrelationships between costs, utilities can identify high costs in different processes and rectify inefficient processes to create a lean organization 3
Increased competition brought on by market liberalization makes cost-to-serve increasingly important for energy retailers 3
Demand response and energy efficiency initiatives reduce utilities' revenues 3
Smart metering will bring cost-to-serve into focus 3
Current cost-to-serve calculation is hampered by inconsistency and inefficiency 3
Most reporting tools that are currently available were designed for wider ABM applications 3
SAP is currently the only vendor offering a utility-specific cost-to-serve reporting tool - others will follow 4
MARKET ConTEXT: COST-TO-SERVE IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT METRICS FOR A UTILITY 5
Cost-to-serve is a utilities-specific version of activity-based management 5
Activity-based management has been most successful in manufacturing, although some utilities have shown some interest 5
ABM focuses on allocating costs to activities and processes 5
ABM is not easy to implement 6
IT plays a part in the successful implementation of activity-based management 7
Cost-to-serve allocates costs associated with activities and processes within a utility's retail business 7
Cost-to-serve calculations break down a utility's costs across approximately nine functional areas 7
A utility's approach to cost-to-serve is very different for commercial and residential customers 8
Cost-to-serve analysis helps utilities to improve business processes and reduce costs 9
Utilities can benchmark their costs relative to other organizations 9
Segmenting customers into clusters of similar cost-to-serve can improve profitability 9
By analyzing interrelationships between costs, utilities can identify high costs in different processes ... 10
... and rectify inefficient processes to create a lean organization 11
business Focus: COST-TO-SERVE IS RISING UP THE CORPORATE AGENDA 12
There has been an historical ambivalence towards cost-to-serve in regulated markets 12
Increased competition brought on by market liberalization makes cost-to-serve increasingly important for energy retailers 12
Forthcoming infrastructure investments will put pressure on utilities' profitability 13
The economic downturn increases utilities' customers' credit risk 13
Demand response and energy efficiency initiatives reduce utilities' revenues 14
Smart metering will bring cost-to-serve into focus 14
Technology FOCUS: THE CURRENT INTEREST IN COST-TO-SERVE CREATES AN OPPORTUNITY FOR VENDORS IN THE UTILITIES SPACE 15
Current cost-to-serve calculation is hampered by inconsistency and inefficiency 15
Most reporting tools that are currently available were designed for wider ABM applications 16
SAP is the industry leader in cost-to-serve reporting, but others will enter the space 17
SAP is currently the only vendor offering a utility-specific cost-to-serve reporting tool 17
SAS has also recognized there is an opportunity in the market 17
Cost-to-serve reporting tools can act as sales enablers 17
RECOMMENDATIONS 18
Recommendations for utilities 18
Recommendations for vendors 18
Alternative views 19
APPENDIX 19
Ask the analyst 19
Definitions 19
Further reading 19
Disclaimer 20
List of Figures
Figure 1: There are nine key functional areas that impact cost-to-serve 7
Figure 2: Aggregated total cost-to-serve of the UK energy retail market 8
Figure 3: Poor processes in one part of the business can cause increased costs in others 11
Figure 4: Sales and registration costs make up a considerable proportion of total cost-to-serve 13
[Inhaltsverzeichnis ausblenden]