DATAMONITOR VIEW 1
CATALYST 1
SUMMARY 1
ANALYSIS 2
Gas Market Overview 2
Industry Landscape 2
Wholesale Environment 2
Gas Supply and Demand Analysis 2
Gas Infrastructure 5
Pipelines 5
LNG 6
Electricity Market Overview 6
Industry Landscape 6
Electricity Supply and Demand Analysis 7
Electricity Infrastructure 10
Generation Capacity 10
Electricity Networks 11
Competitive Intensity Analysis Overview 12
Datamonitor's MCI Index offers a robust framework for measuring the development of energy Market Competitive Intensity 12
The MCI Index shows how competitive a particular market is. This has applications for both new entrants seeking to enter the market, and established players and former monopoly incumbents seeking to defend their market share from new entrants. 12
The MCI Index assesses markets as they stood in early 2010 and forecasts conditions likely to be prevailing in 2013. 12
The MCI assessment draws on nine underlying metrics grouped into three broad clusters: Market framework; Supplier Push; Customer Pull 13
Each of the nine pillars has an assessment scale to allow for the comparison of diverse markets (see appendix for more details) 14
Gas Market Competitive Intensity 15
Queensland's gas score is constrained by weak customer pull metrics 15
Queensland's gas score is constrained by weak customer pull metrics 16
Queensland market framework scores remain in the higher band 16
Effectiveness of regulator [2010: 8/10 2013: 9/10] 16
Ease of third party access [2010: 9/10 2013: 10/10] 16
Pricing Regime [2010: 6/10 2013: 7/10] 17
The Supplier Push metrics continue to develop over the forecast period 17
Wholesale market fragmentation [2010: 5/10 2013: 6/10] 17
Retail market fragmentation [2010: 2.5/10 2013: 4.5/10] 17
Traded market maturity [2010: 3.5/10 2013: 5.5/10] 17
Customer Pull metrics remain modest 17
Access to market information and assistance [2010: 7/10 2013: 8/10] 17
Consumer representation [2010: 6/10 2013: 7/10] 17
Propensity to switch [2010: 2.5/10 2013: 4.5/10] 18
Electricity Market Competitive Intensity 19
All of Queensland's power scores are at the upper end of the scale 20
All the pillars of market framework remain in the upper half of the scale 20
Effectiveness of regulator [2010: 8/10 2013: 9/10] 20
Ease of third Party access [2010: 9/10 2013: 10/10] 20
Pricing Regime [2010: 7/10 2013: 8/10] 21
The Supplier Push metrics are constrained by retail market concentration 21
Wholesale market fragmentation [2010: 5/10 2013: 5.5/10] 21
Retail market fragmentation [2010: 4.5/10 2013: 5/10] 21
Traded market maturity [2010: 9/10 2013: 10/10] 21
Queensland has weak consumer pull scores 21
Access to market information and assistance [2010: 7/10 2013: 8/10] 21
Consumer representation [2010: 6/10 2013: 7/10] 21
Propensity to switch [2010: 3/10 2013: 4/10] 22
Outlook: Both the gas and power markets provide commercial opportunities for new entrants 22
COMPETITIVE INTENSITY ANALYSIS APPENDIX 23
MCI Scores Summary 23
MCI Scoring Scales 25
APPENDIX 30
Definitions 30
Ask the analyst 31
Datamonitor consulting 31
Disclaimer 31
List of Tables
Table 1: Australia gas supply and demand balance, 2008?09e 3
Table 2: Australia's power supply and demand balance, 2008?09e 7
Table 3: Market Competitive Intensity, Queensland 2010 and 2013 23
Table 4: MCI Additive, Asia Pacific 2010 and 2013 24
Table 5: MCI Multiplicative, Asia Pacific 2010 and 2013 24
List of Figures
Figure 1: Australia gas sectoral consumption, 2009e 4
Figure 2: Queensland gas consumption, trends and forecasts, 2005?2020f 5
Figure 3: Australian power production by fuel type, 2009e 8
Figure 4: Australia power sectoral consumption, 2009e 9
Figure 5: Queensland power consumption, trends and forecasts, 2005?2020f 10
Figure 6: MCI Assessment Scale 12
Figure 7: MCI Assessment Framework 13
Figure 8: MCI Scales 14
Figure 9: European Gas Market Competitive Intensity, 2010-13 15
Figure 10: Gas Market Competitive Intensity, Queensland 16
Figure 11: Asia Pacific Power Market Competitive Intensity, 2010-13 19
Figure 12: Power Market Competitive Intensity, Queensland 20
Figure 13: Market Competitive Intensity, Queensland 22
Figure 14: Scale for MCI Assessment, Effectiveness of Regulator 25
Figure 15: Scale for MCI Assessment, Ease of Third Party Access 26
Figure 16: Scale for MCI Assessment, Pricing Regime 26
Figure 17: Scale for MCI Assessment, Wholesale Market Fragmentation 27
Figure 18: Scale for MCI Assessment, Retail Market Fragmentation 27
Figure 19: Scale for MCI Assessment, Traded Market Maturity 28
Figure 20: Scale for MCI Assessment, Access to Market Information 28
Figure 21: Scale for MCI Assessment, Consumer Representation 29
Figure 22: Scale for MCI Assessment, Propensity to Switch 29
[Inhaltsverzeichnis ausblenden]