DATAMONITOR VIEW 1
CATALYST 1
SUMMARY 1
ANALYSIS 2
Introduction: Datamonitor's MCI Index offers a robust framework for measuring the development of energy Market Competitive Intensity 2
The MCI Index shows how attractive a particular market is to new entrants in terms of the competitive environment 2
The MCI assessment draws on nine underlying metrics grouped into three broad clusters: Market framework; Supplier Push; Customer Pull. 3
The MCI Index measures competitive intensity in EU 27 and 6 related markets 4
The MCI Index assesses markets as they stood in early 2008 and forecasts conditions likely to be prevailing three years after full market opening 4
Each of the nine pillars has an assessment scale to allow for the comparison of diverse markets (see appendix for more details) 5
Two differing overall MCI scores are calculated to ensure full clarity of results 5
A simple weighted average (additive) measure shows overall competitive intensity 5
A weighted multiple (multiplicative) measure shows overall competitive intensity 5
The MCI framework has a number of applications for your organization 6
Context: Poland's gas and power position remains clustered with the least competitive markets surveyed 7
Poland's power ranking changes only slightly over the forecast period 7
Poland's gas ranking remains constant over the forecast period 7
Power MCI: Poland's power market achieves an average score overall 9
Market Framework scores will remain modest in 2010 9
Effectiveness of Regulator [2008: 3/10 2010: 5/10] 9
Ease of Third Party Access [2008: 3.5/10 2010: 5/10] 9
Effectiveness of Balancing and Data Transfer [2008: 2/10 2010: 5/10] 10
Supplier Push metrics likely to improve by 2010 10
Wholesale Market Fragmentation [2008: 4.5/10 2010: 6/10] 10
Retail Market Fragmentation [2008: 9/10 2010: 10/10] 10
Traded Market Maturity [2008: 2.3/10 2010: 4.5/10] 10
Customer Pull metrics are very much at the lower end of the scale and are likely to remain so in July 2010 11
Access to Market Information and Assistance [2008: 3/10 2010: 4/10] 11
Consumer Representation [2008: 2/10 2010: 4/10] 11
Propensity to Switch [2008: 2/10 2010: 3.5/10] 11
Gas MCI: Poland's Customer Pull metrics remain low during the forecast period 12
None of the Market Framework metrics increase their scores significantly between now and 2010 12
Effectiveness of Regulator [2008: 3/10 2010: 4/10] 12
Ease of Third Party Access [2008: 2/10 2010: 3/10] 13
Effectiveness of Balancing and Data Transfer [2008: 5/10 2010: 5.5/10] 13
A lack of access to wholesale gas supplies constrains Poland's Supplier Push scores 13
Wholesale Market Fragmentation [2008: 1.5/10 2010: 2/10] 13
Retail Market Fragmentation [2008: 4.5/10 2010: 5.5/10] 13
Traded Market Maturity [2008: 0/10 2010: 1.5/10] 13
Customer Pull metrics also remains at the lower end of the scale by 2010 13
Access to Market Information and Assistance [2008: 0.5/10 2010: 2/10] 13
Consumer Representation [2008: 1.5/10 2010: 2.5/10] 14
Propensity to Switch [2008: 1/10 2010: 2/10] 14
Outlook: Opportunities in the Polish gas market lag those potentially available in the power market 15
There is a degree of diversity between the levels of competitive intensity in the Polish gas and power markets 15
Power scores 15
Gas scores 15
Growing environmental pressures are creating strong commercial opportunities for generators 16
New Market Entrant Opportunities, Power 16
New Market Entrant Threats, Power 16
Supply constrains for gas are just one of the many reasons why the Polish gas market is an unattractive option for new entrants 16
New Market Entrant Opportunities, Gas 16
New Market Entrant Threats, Gas 16
MCI Scores 17
APPENDIX 20
Definitions 20
Ask the analyst 25
[Inhaltsverzeichnis ausblenden]