|
|
UK Pharmaceutical Market Overview - Pricing and reimbursement challenges dampen future growth
|
|||||||||||
| Preis** (Lieferformat): |
Versandkostenfrei ** WICHTIG: Alle Preise sind netto ausgewiesen. Abhängig von Versand- und Leistungsort ist hierauf noch USt. zu entrichten (Deutschland z.Z. 19%). Der korrekte Gesamtendpreis wird Ihnen mit der Angabe Ihrer Rechnungsadresse, USt-ID-Nr. etc. im Bestellverlauf ausgewiesen. Weitere Informationen zu den Bestandteilen des Kaufpreises finden Sie in unseren FAQs. |
Zahlen und Fakten zur Studie: | 221 seiten | |||||||||
| Inhalt der Studie: |
Introduction
The UK prescription pharmaceutical market was valued at $28.4 billion in 2009. Key growth drivers include growing use of chronic high-value innovative treatments driven by a rising elder.....
Introduction The UK prescription pharmaceutical market was valued at $28.4 billion in 2009. Key growth drivers include growing use of chronic high-value innovative treatments driven by a rising elderly population, high public healthcare expenditure as proportion of total healthcare expenditure, relatively light pricing controls through the PPRS, and speedy domestic drug approvals. Scope *Overview of the UK's socioeconomic and demographic trends, healthcare system, regulation, pricing and reimbursement and intellectual property position *Assesses the size of the UK's pharmaceutical market by prescribing setting, therapy area, leading brands and by leading companies *Examines the UK's generics and biosimilars landscape in terms of regulatory issues, level of penetration, key players and degree of brand erosion *Quantifies the UK's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure for the leading pharmaceutical companies, including key metrics and domestic M&A analysis. Highlights The UK pharmaceutical industry has to some extent been cushioned from the effects of the recession. However, the NHS now faces cuts and with price cuts to be implemented in Southern Europe further stimulating the parallel exportation of drugs out of these markets, branded drug sales in the UK market will certainly be impacted. The UK's Department of Health is considering imposing mandatory generic substitution at the pharmacist level, as part of the renegotiated PPRS which came into effect in 2009. Mandatory substitution should boost generics volume uptake in the UK, but the extent of the increase is likely to be limited, given the widespread use of generics in the UK. The UK has a strong track record for drug development. However, Roche and Novartis have threatened to pull out of the UK due to ongoing debates over drug pricing, expensive and bureaucratic clinical trials, and recent non-approval decisions by NICE. Also, a number of key players are downsizing their UK operations in an effort to reduce costs. Reasons to Purchase *Evaluate the evolving regulatory landscape and the impact of pricing and reimbursement controls on market access. *Quantify the size and growth of the prescription pharmaceutical market in the UK, analyzing key therapy areas, brands and companies. *Assess drivers and resistors of generic and biosimilars uptake in the UK as well as the level of erosion brands can expect to face post patent expiry. [Studien Infos ausblenden] |
|||||||||||
|
ABOUT DATAMONITOR HEALTHCARE 2 About the Healthcare Strategic Analysis Team 2 Country specific reports: 2 Global issue reports: 2 1. Executive Summary 3 Strategic scoping and focus 3 Key findings - UK healthcare drivers and resistors 4 Socio-demographic and economic analysis 8 UK socio-demographic trends 8 UK socio-economic trends 8 Healthcare system and drug regulatory analysis 10 UK healthcare expenditure 10 UK healthcare system overview 11 UK regulatory issues 11 UK pricing and reimbursement issues 11 Prescription pharmaceutical sales analysis 13 UK pharmaceutical market size 13 UK leading therapy areas 13 UK leading prescription pharmaceutical brands 13 UK pharmaceutical companies 13 Drug expiry analysis 15 UK generics market 15 UK brand erosion post patent expiry 15 UK biosimilars market 15 Pharmaceutical industry infrastructure analysis 17 UK pharmaceutical industry infrastructure overview 17 UK R&D infrastructure trends 17 UK manufacturing infrastructure trends 18 Related reports 20 Upcoming related reports 20 Table of Contents 21 2. Socio-demographic and economic analysis 22 Key findings 22 UK socio-demographic trends 22 UK socio-economic trends 22 Demographic trends in the UK 23 UK population growth rate expected to slow 24 Birth rate in UK is declining 26 Proportion of elderly people in the UK expected to rise and then level off 27 Life expectancy will continue to increase in the UK and across other markets 28 Disease burden in the UK 29 Ischemic heart disease is the leading cause of death in the UK 29 Non-communicable diseases are the main cause of overall disease burden in the UK 31 Communicable diseases are a relatively uncommon cause of death in the UK, but healthcare-associated infections are on the rise 32 Political climate in the UK 33 The recent general election has resulted in a change of ruling political party and the formation of a coalition government 33 UK economy still vulnerable after recession 34 Pharma has historically been relatively well insulated from the recession, but the NHS could face cuts 36 The UK has high standards of living, but there are income inequalities 37 Business environment in the UK 37 UK corporate tax rate one of the lowest in the EU 37 Unemployment rate is high 38 3. Healthcare system and drug regulatory analysis 39 Key findings 39 UK healthcare expenditure 39 UK healthcare system 39 UK regulatory issues 39 UK pricing and reimbursement issues 40 Healthcare expenditure - UK lags behind most developed nations 41 Healthcare system in the UK 43 NHS is the main healthcare provider in the UK 43 A number of stakeholders exist within the NHS 44 Investment in the NHS has risen substantially over the last decade, but cuts loom 46 UK is lagging behind other countries in health outcomes 46 Private healthcare provision is supplementary to the NHS 47 Primary versus hospital care - the number of hospital beds is falling in the UK as community care becomes more prominent 48 Healthcare system reform in the UK 48 Regulatory issues in the UK 50 Drug approval and regulatory processes 50 MHRA is the national body in charge of regulating medicines 50 Cost of regulatory filings varies according to type of authorization procedure used 51 UK's MHRA boasts short approval times 52 The application process in the UK is straightforward 53 UK license holders must report adverse drug reactions to EudraVigilance 54 New initiatives aim to reduce regulatory burdens on Pharma 54 The EU centralized procedure is convenient but expensive 54 Decentralized procedure introduced to address disputes in mutual recognition procedure 55 Country order of launch - brands tend to launch early in the UK 55 Intellectual property environment ? UK court determines validity of patents in the UK 56 High number of patent litigations and expensive fees but litigation times are short 56 Supplementary protection certificates give extra protection 57 Data exclusivity issues in the UK - the 8+2+1 rule 57 Pediatric SPC extension provides additional market exclusivity period 58 Drug counterfeiting - UK is becoming an easy target for counterfeiters 58 Drug importation in the UK ? companies wishing to import or export medicines must have licenses 59 Although the UK is generally a target country for parallel trade a recent surge in parallel exports has led to shortages of medicines 60 Pricing and reimbursement in the UK 62 Pricing issues in the UK 64 PPRS is a light form of pricing regulation 64 2009 PPRS introduced flexible pricing to reward innovation 66 Value-based pricing in the future? 66 UK drug prices among lowest in Western markets as a result of weak pound 67 Discounts obtained by hospitals, PCTs and pharmacies add further complexity to determining UK drug prices 68 Reimbursement issues in the UK 68 NICE is the key reimbursement body in the UK 68 SMC is NICE's equivalent in Scotland 69 Cost-effectiveness analysis forms the basis of NICE's appraisal 69 NICE appraises only a subset of drugs 71 NICE's review process - thorough but lengthy 72 Patient empowerment can have an impact on NICE reviews 73 Time delays caused by NICE are a significant issue 74 NICE has issued a number of controversial decisions and negative guidance over the past few years 74 Lack of transparency and over-reliance on QALY draws criticism from pharma industry 75 NICE's appraisal process prompted parliamentary review 76 Risk-sharing schemes are becoming the norm for expensive drugs 77 End-of-life guidance does not guarantee NICE approval 79 Better access to drugs on the horizon in the UK? 80 Will the new cancer drug fund improve access to cancer treatments in the UK? 81 Other pricing and reimbursement issues in the UK 81 Prescription charges do not have a significant impact on which drug is dispensed 81 Top-up payments have been introduced recently but used mostly for drugs not approved by NICE 81 4. Prescription pharmaceutical sales analysis 82 Key findings 82 Pharmaceutical market size in the UK 83 Leading therapy areas in the UK 85 Central nervous system drugs hold the largest share of the UK market value 87 Oncology drugs exhibited the strongest sales during 2005-09 88 Immunology and inflammation drugs showed the fastest sales growth between 2008 and 2009 88 Gastroenterology and cardiovascular drugs saw declining sales 88 Leading prescription pharmaceutical brands in the UK 90 Leading brand Seretide may face competition from faster-growing Symbicort 91 Lipitor has begun to suffer from sales erosion from other generic statins 91 Enbrel's solid growth is attributed to its superior efficacy and having secured approval for multiple indications 91 Leading pharmaceutical companies in the UK prescription pharmaceutical market 94 The leading international companies struggle to maintain growth momentum 95 The leading domestic companies experience impressive growth 98 GlaxoSmithKline 99 AstraZeneca 100 Shire 100 5. Drug expiry analysis 101 Key findings 101 UK generics market 101 UK brand erosion post patent expiry 101 UK biosimilars market 101 UK generics market dynamics 103 UK generics volume uptake 104 UK generics value uptake 105 UK generics market size 106 Drivers and resistors in the UK generics market 107 The proportion of prescribed and dispensed generic drugs has been steadily rising in the UK 108 The government is looking to impose mandatory generic substitution to further drive generic uptake 109 Improved efficiency in generic pricing across PCTs could significantly cut drug costs 110 Savings achievable through increased generic statin use have made them a target for cost-cutting initiatives 110 Large price differential between brands and generics is indicative of a commodity generics market in the UK 111 Key generics players in the UK market 113 Opportunities for the generics industry 114 Small molecule brand erosion in the UK 116 Overview of drugs analyzed 116 Mean level of brand erosion in the UK 117 Brand erosion in the UK retail and hospital setting 118 Brand erosion by therapy area in the UK 120 Brand erosion by drug formulation in the UK 122 UK biosimilars market dynamics 124 Drivers and resistors to biosimilar uptake in the UK - hospital purchasing decisions pivotal to driving biosimilar uptake 124 Key players in the UK biosimilars market 125 Biosimilar epoetin 125 Epoetin volume and value market share 126 Branded epoetin prices in the UK market post biosimilar entry 128 Biosimilar epoetin market share 129 Biosimilar filgrastim 130 Filgrastim volume and value market share 130 Branded filgrastim prices in the UK market post biosimilar entry 132 Biosimilar filgrastim market share 134 Biosimilar somatropin 135 Somatropin volume and value market share 136 New and future biosimilar launches 138 Opportunities for the biosimilars industry 139 Branded monoclonal antibody therapies could soon face biosimilar incursion 142 Biosimilars in development internationally 143 6. Pharmaceutical industry infrastructure analysis 145 Key findings 145 UK pharmaceutical industry infrastructure overview 145 UK R&D infrastructure trends 145 UK manufacturing infrastructure trends 145 UK pharmaceutical industry infrastructure overview 147 R&D and manufacturing strategies in the UK 147 R&D operations downsized to produce more focused pipeline offering higher returns 148 Manufacturers reduce investment in UK facilities and look to outsourcing 149 Key company infrastructure in the UK 149 Pfizer 150 Pfizer's acquisition and integration of Wyeth has resulted in the closure of two R&D sites 153 Pfizer phases out manufacturing in the UK 153 Pfizer enhances its biotech capabilities through M&A activity 155 GlaxoSmithKline 156 GlaxoSmithKline restructures to focus on rare diseases, downsizing R&D in the UK 158 Two manufacturing plants to shut due to lower demand as a result of generic competition 159 Berkshire Hathaway buys a small stake in GlaxoSmithKline 161 Sanofi-Aventis 162 Sanofi-Aventis restructures, cutting R&D spend in favor of R&D partnership agreements 164 Lower demand for maturing drugs leads to closure of a UK manufacturing plant 164 Sanofi-Aventis's acquisition of Acambis expands its vaccines offering 166 AstraZeneca 167 AstraZeneca to implement heavy cuts in R&D workforce 169 Manufacturing capabilities replaced by outsourcing 169 Merck & Co. 171 Roche 175 Roche's strengthens its pipeline with promising early-stage compounds 179 Johnson & Johnson 180 DePuy strengthens its hip implants offering through the acquisition of Finsbury Orthopaedics 182 Eli Lilly 184 Novartis 188 UK manufacturing site helped Novartis reach record sales in 2009 190 Latest restructuring plan has created a leaner operating environment 191 Boehringer Ingelheim 192 7. Bibliography 196 Executive summary 196 Publications and online articles 196 Datamonitor reports and products 196 Socio-demographic and Economic analysis 196 Publications and online articles 196 Datamonitor reports and products 198 Healthcare system & drug regulation 198 Publications and online articles 198 Datamonitor reports and products 204 Pharmaceutical sales analysis 205 Publications and online articles 205 Datamonitor reports and products 205 Drug expiry analysis 205 Publications and online articles 205 Datamonitor reports and products 208 Industry infrastructure analysis 209 Publications and online articles 209 Datamonitor reports and products 211 APPENDIX 212 Exchange rates 212 UK brand erosion - additional data and analysis 213 UK brand erosion - methodology 215 UK brand erosion - therapy area classification 217 About Datamonitor 218 About Datamonitor Healthcare 218 Datamonitor consulting 218 Disclaimer 220 List of Tables Table 1: UK - changes in the key value drivers of the UK pharmaceutical market, 2005-09 6 Table 2: UK - demographic indicators, 2005 and 2010 8 Table 3: UK - key economic indicators, 2005-2012 9 Table 4: UK - healthcare expenditure indicators, 2006-09 10 Table 5: UK - pricing and reimbursement tools, 2010 12 Table 6: UK - sales and volume of the prescription pharmaceutical market ($ and IMS Standard Units), 2009 14 Table 7: UK - key metrics for the generics and biosimilars market, 2010 16 Table 8: UK - pharmaceutical industry metrics, 2007-09 17 Table 9: UK - R&D and manufacturing infrastructure mean data for top 10 pharma companies in the UK, 2008-2010 19 Table 10: UK - demographic indicators, 2005 and 2010 23 Table 11: UK - top 10 causes of mortality, 2004 29 Table 12: UK - disability-adjusted life years (DALY) rates compared to Australia, Japan, the BRIC nations, North America and other key European markets, 2004 31 Table 13: UK - key economic indicators, 2005-2012 34 Table 14: UK - healthcare expenditure indicators, 2006-09 42 Table 15: UK - hospital bed and healthcare worker density, 2002 and 2007 48 Table 16: UK - fees payable to Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). 2010 51 Table 17: Order of launch for new molecules in the US, Japan, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK, Canada and Australia 55 Table 18: UK - a range of pricing and reimbursement tools are used 62 Table 19: UK - Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS) mandated price adjustments, 2009-2013 65 Table 20: UK - comparison of ex-manufacturer prices in the UK with selected developed nations, 2004-08 67 Table 21: UK - NICE has rejected a number of drugs on the basis of poor cost-effectiveness 75 Table 22: UK - risk-sharing agreements companies entered into with NICE, 2009-2010 77 Table 23: UK - sales and volume of the prescription pharmaceutical market ($ and IMS Standard Units), 2009 84 Table 24: UK - pharmaceutical sales by therapy area ($m and %), 2005-09 86 Table 25: UK - pharmaceutical volume by therapy area (SUm and %), 2005-09 87 Table 26: UK - sales growth for top 20 pharmaceutical brands ($m and %), 2009 92 Table 27: UK - volume growth for top 20 pharmaceutical brands (SUm and %), 2009 93 Table 28: UK - sales growth for the leading international pharmaceutical companies ($ and %), 2009 96 Table 29: UK - volume growth for the leading international pharmaceutical companies in the UK (SU and %), 2009 97 Table 30: UK - sales growth for the leading UK-based pharmaceutical companies ($ and %), 2009 98 Table 31: UK - volume growth for the leading UK-based pharmaceutical companies (SU and %), 2009 99 Table 32: UK - key metrics for the generics and biosimilars market, 2010 102 Table 33: UK - comparison of generic penetration versus other major pharmaceutical markets ($ billion and %), 2007-08 103 Table 34: UK - leading generics companies, 2009 113 Table 35: UK - brands exposed to generic competition, 2010-12 114 Table 36: UK - key metrics for the biosimilars market, 2009 124 Table 37: UK - leading biosimilar companies, 2009 125 Table 38: Biosimilars approved and rejected in Europe by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to May 2010 138 Table 39: UK - sales (based on 2009 sales data) of biologics both expired and expected to come off-patent in 2010-15 141 Table 40: UK - pharmaceutical industry metrics, 2007-09 147 Table 41: UK - prescription sales growth for the top 10 pharmaceutical companies ($m and %), 2009 149 Table 42: UK - Pfizer's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure (post-merger with Wyeth), 2010 150 Table 43: UK - Pfizer's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure data (post-merger with Wyeth), 2010 151 Table 44: UK - Pfizer's UK-based M&A activity, 2008-2010 155 Table 45: UK - GlaxoSmithKline's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure, 2010 156 Table 46: UK - GlaxoSmithKline's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure data, 2010 157 Table 47: UK - GlaxoSmithKline's UK-based M&A activity, 2008-2010 161 Table 48: UK - Sanofi-Aventis's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure, 2010 162 Table 49: UK - Sanofi-Aventis's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure data, 2010 163 Table 50: UK - Sanofi-Aventis's UK-based M&A activity, 2008-2010 166 Table 51: UK - AstraZeneca's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure, 2010 167 Table 52: UK - AstraZeneca's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure data, 2010 168 Table 53: UK - Merck & Co's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure (post acquisition of Schering-Plough), 2010 171 Table 54: UK - Merck & Co's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure data (post acquisition of Schering-Plough), 2010 172 Table 55: UK - Roche's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure, 2010 175 Table 56: UK - Roche's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure data, 2010 176 Table 57: UK - Roche's UK-based M&A activity, 2008-2010 179 Table 58: UK - Johnson & Johnson's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure, 2010 180 Table 59: UK - Johnson & Johnson's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure data, 2010 181 Table 60: UK - Johnson & Johnson's UK-based M&A activity, 2008-2010 183 Table 61: UK - Eli Lilly's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure, 2010 184 Table 62: UK - Eli Lilly R&D and manufacturing infrastructure data, 2010 185 Table 63: UK - Novartis's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure, 2010 188 Table 64: UK - Novartis's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure data, 2010 189 Table 65: UK - Boehringer Ingelheim's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure, 2010 192 Table 66: UK - Boehringer Ingelheim's R&D and manufacturing infrastructure data, 2010 193 Table 67: Currency exchange rates, 2010 212 Table 68: ATC (anatomical therapeutic chemical) classification codes assigned to a given therapy area 217 List of Figures Figure 1: UK - key value drivers of the UK pharmaceutical market, 2009 4 Figure 2: UK - drivers and resistors facing branded pharmaceutical companies 7 Figure 3: UK - population and population growth rate, 1950-2050 24 Figure 4: UK - population growth compared to the other seven major markets, Australia, Japan, the BRIC nations, North America and other key European markets, 1950-2050 25 Figure 5: UK - birth rates per 1,000 individuals compared to the other seven major markets, Australia, Japan, the BRIC nations, North America and other key European markets, 1950-2050 26 Figure 6: UK - proportion of population over 65 years compared to the other seven major markets, Australia, Japan, the BRIC nations, North America and other key European markets, 1950-2050 27 Figure 7: UK - life expectancy compared to the other seven major markets, Australia, Japan, the BRIC nations, North America and other key European markets,1950-2050 28 Figure 8: UK - GDP per capita growth rate compared to, Australia, Japan, the BRIC nations, North America and other key European markets, 2005-09 35 Figure 9: Debt trap rankings for the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, US, Canada, Australia and Japan, 2010 36 Figure 10: Unemployment rates in the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, US, Canada, Australia, Japan, Brazil, India, Russia and China, 1990-2008 38 Figure 11: UK - the proportion of GDP expenditure on healthcare is lower compared to most other developed nations, 2007 41 Figure 12: UK - flow of money and accountability within the National Health Service (NHS) 44 Figure 13: UK - primary care trusts (PCTs) are the key stakeholders within the National Health Service (NHS) 45 Figure 14: UK - structure of the private healthcare system 47 Figure 15: UK - four routes for obtaining market authorization in the UK 51 Figure 16: UK - Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) application process 53 Figure 17: EU - the 8+2+1 market exclusivity rule 57 Figure 18: UK - a number of different bodies impact drug prescription and use 63 Figure 19: UK - advantages and disadvantages of the Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS) for the UK pharmaceutical industry 66 Figure 20: UK - NICE's topic selection process 71 Figure 21: UK - NICE's review process 73 Figure 22: UK - drivers and resistors of entering into risk-sharing agreements 78 Figure 23: UK - three new schemes aim to improve access to drugs, 2010 80 Figure 24: UK - relative sales and volume of the UK prescription pharmaceutical market (indexed against volume or value in 2005), 2005-09 83 Figure 25: UK - pharmaceutical sales by therapy area (%), 2005-09 85 Figure 26: UK - sales growth for the leading pharmaceutical brands ($m and %), 2009 90 Figure 27: UK - sales growth for leading pharmaceutical companies (%), 2005-09 94 Figure 28: UK - comparison of generic volume uptake versus other major pharmaceutical markets (%), 2007-08 104 Figure 29: UK - comparison of generic value uptake versus other major pharmaceutical markets (%), 2007-08 105 Figure 30: UK - comparison of generics market size versus other pharmaceutical markets ($ billion), 2007-08 106 Figure 31: UK - key factors influencing the UK generic industry, 2010 107 Figure 32: England - generic prescribing and dispensing (%), 1998-2008 108 Figure 33: UK - brand sales at risk of generic erosion ($m), 2010-12 115 Figure 34: UK - mean erosion (by value and volume) of branded small molecules during the first 2 years of generic competition (%) 117 Figure 35: UK - mean erosion (by value and volume) of branded small molecules by prescribing setting during the first 2 years of generic competition 119 Figure 36: UK - mean erosion (by value and volume) of branded small molecules by therapy area during the first 2 years of generic competition 121 Figure 37: UK - mean erosion (by value and volume) of branded small molecules by formulation during the first 2 years of generic competition 123 Figure 38: UK - biosimilar versus branded epoetin alpha volume uptake (%), 2009 126 Figure 39: UK - biosimilar versus branded epoetin alpha value uptake (%), 2009 127 Figure 40: UK - unit price for Aranesp, NeoRecormon and Eprex, 2008-09 128 Figure 41: UK - biosimilar epoetin market share by volume (%), 2008-09 129 Figure 42: UK - biosimilar versus branded filgrastim volume uptake (%), 2008-09 130 Figure 43: UK - biosimilar versus branded filgrastim value uptake (%), 2008-09 131 Figure 44: UK - unit price for Neupogen and Granocyte ($/SU), 2008-09 132 Figure 45: UK - unit price for Neulasta ($/SU), 2008-09 133 Figure 46: UK - biosimilar versus branded filgrastim market share by volume (%), 2008-09 134 Figure 47: UK - biosimilar versus branded somatropin volume uptake (%), 2006-09 136 Figure 48: UK - biosimilar versus branded somatropin value uptake (%), 2006-09 137 Figure 49: UK - sales (based on 2009 sales data) of biologics both expired and expected to come off-patent during 2010-15 140 Figure 50: Drivers and resistors to biosimilar monoclonal antibody entry, 2010 143 Figure 51: Key biosimilars in development internationally by product class, 2010 144 Figure 52: Pharma's strategic responses to slowing sales and operating profit growth 148 Figure 53: UK - Pfizer's R&D presence (post-merger with Wyeth), 2010 152 Figure 54: UK - Pfizer's pharmaceutical operations (post-merger with Wyeth), 2010 154 Figure 55: UK - GlaxoSmithKline's R&D and manufacturing presence, 2010 158 Figure 56: UK - GlaxoSmithKline's pharmaceutical operations, 2010 160 Figure 57: UK - Sanofi-Aventis's R&D presence, 2010 164 Figure 58: UK - Sanofi-Aventis's pharmaceutical operations, 2010 165 Figure 59: UK - AstraZeneca's R&D and manufacturing presence, 2010 169 Figure 60: UK - AstraZeneca's pharmaceutical operations, 2010 170 Figure 61: UK - Merck & Co's R&D and manufacturing presence (post acquisition of Schering-Plough), 2010 173 Figure 62: UK - Merck & Co's pharmaceutical operations (post acquisition of Schering-Plough), 2010 174 Figure 63: UK - Roche's R&D presence, 2010 177 Figure 64: UK - Roche's pharmaceutical operations, 2010 178 Figure 65: UK - Johnson & Johnson's pharmaceutical operations, 2010 182 Figure 66: UK - Eli Lilly's R&D and manufacturing presence, 2010 186 Figure 67: UK - Eli Lilly's pharmaceutical operations, 2010 187 Figure 68: UK - Novartis's R&D presence, 2010 190 Figure 69: UK - Novartis's pharmaceutical operations, 2010 191 Figure 70: UK - Boehringer Ingelheim's R&D and manufacturing presence, 2010 194 Figure 71: UK - Boehringer Ingelheim's pharmaceutical operations, 2010 195 Figure 72: UK - sales erosion of branded small molecules during the first 2 years of generic competition 213 Figure 73: UK - volume erosion of branded small molecules during the first 2 years of generic competition 214 Figure 74: Drugs experiencing generic erosion between Q1 2006 and Q2 2007 215 Figure 75: Erosion curves for each drug experiencing generic entry 216 Figure 76: Mean erosion curve for drugs A, B, and C experiencing generic entry 217 [Inhaltsverzeichnis ausblenden] |
||||||||||||
| Hinweis: | * Der Rechnungsbetrag für diese Studie wird in $ (Dollar) ausgewiesen. Kunden aus dem Inland bekommen von uns eine Rechnung in Euro, umgerechnet zum letztwöchigen Schlusskurs | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||


