Marktstudien » Technologie / Medien » Informationstechnologie IT » Informationstechnologie IT allgemein u. sonstige »
|
|
Pipeline Insight: Nosocomial Vaccines - Minefield or Goldmine?
|
|||||||||||
| Preis** (Lieferformat): |
Versandkostenfrei ** WICHTIG: Alle Preise sind netto ausgewiesen. Abhängig von Versand- und Leistungsort ist hierauf noch USt. zu entrichten (Deutschland z.Z. 19%). Der korrekte Gesamtendpreis wird Ihnen mit der Angabe Ihrer Rechnungsadresse, USt-ID-Nr. etc. im Bestellverlauf ausgewiesen. Weitere Informationen zu den Bestandteilen des Kaufpreises finden Sie in unseren FAQs. |
|||||||||||
| Zahlen und Fakten zur Studie: |
Reasons to Purchase Review the epidemiological, clinical and economical factors driving new product decisions in nosocomial vaccine development. Gain insight into the pipeline through a discussion of key candidates in clinical development for five nosocomial pathogens. Understand and identify key market opportunities by reviewing sizing estimates for key target populations by pathogen. 205 pages | |||||||||||
| Inhalt der Studie: |
Introduction
As the reimbursement status for the cost of hospital-acquired infections is under pressure by payors, interest in preventing these complications at the outset is growing. Nosocomial vacc.....
Introduction As the reimbursement status for the cost of hospital-acquired infections is under pressure by payors, interest in preventing these complications at the outset is growing. Nosocomial vaccines offer one route of prevention. This report assesses the clinical pipeline candidates five key nosocomial pathogens and their potential market environment including target population size estimates. Report Highlights Highlights The increasing incidence and severity of nosocomial infections has sparked an interest in preventive strategies such as vaccination. High costs and reimbursement cuts associated with nosocomial infections provide a strong incentive for healthcare stakeholders to invest in infection prevention, providing a strong rationale for vaccine development. In the highly cost-conscious nosocomials market, a prudent definition of vaccination target groups will be crucial to satisfy the stringent cost-benefit analysis. Whereas patients undergoing planned hospital stays will benefit from vaccination, alternative prevention methods may be preferable for immuno-compromised, newborn and acute patients. Datamonitor believes that C. difficile vaccines will have the easiest route to market due to the large and well-defined target population and a high unmet need. Vaccines against S. aureus and P. aeruginosa could prove valuable in selected target groups, whereas there is only a limited potential for vaccines against S. epidermidis and enterococcus. [Studien Infos ausblenden] |
|||||||||||
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT DATAMONITOR HEALTHCARE 2 About the Infectious Diseases analysis team 2 CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Objective of the analysis 3 Datamonitor insight into the nosocomial vaccines market 3 Contributing experts 5 Related reports 6 Upcoming related reports 6 NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS - OVERVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND KEY TARGETS FOR VACCINE DEVELOPMENT 8 Summary 8 Patients undergoing hospital stays face an elevated risk of infection 8 Nosocomial infections are a key health concern across the 7MM 9 The risk of infection is highest in intensive care units 11 Nosocomial pneumonia and bloodstream infections have the highest mortality rates 13 S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, S. epidermidis, enterococcus spp. and C. difficile are the most promising vaccine targets 14 CHAPTER 2 FACTORS TO CONSIDER FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF THE OPPORTUNITY FOR NOSOCOMIAL VACCINES 17 Summary 17 A multitude of factors determine the market opportunity for nosocomial vaccines 18 Costs associated with nosocomial infections vary between types of infections 20 Multiple costs arise through nosocomial infections 20 Most costs are directly associated with the increasing length of hospital stay 20 Reimbursement regulations for costs related to nosocomial infections differ across the seven major markets 22 US - Medicare changes on the horizon increase the financial pressure on hospitals 22 Despite common belief, US hospitals lose money on nosocomial infections 22 Medicare will cut reimbursement for certain nosocomial infections from October 2008 23 Japan's prospective payment system needs further amendment to incentivize hospitals effectively 27 Most major European markets operate DRG systems; however, levels of impact differ between countries 27 France 27 Germany 28 Italy 29 Spain 29 The UK 30 Various strategies exist for prevention and prophylaxis of nosocomial infections 33 Antibiotic resistance and worse clinical outcome provide a strong rationale for prevention of nosocomial infections 33 There are three key approaches for prevention of nosocomial infection aiming at different target populations 34 Hygiene and infection-control-based strategies 36 Advantages of hygiene and infection control strategies include a significant reduction in infection rates and hospital costs 38 Disadvantages include lack of efficacy and problems regarding implementation 39 Recommendations surrounding infection prevention vary across the 7MM 41 Immunoglobulins 46 Fast protection and the chance to vaccinate patients undergoing unplanned hospitalization are the key advantages of immunoglobulin-based strategies 46 Unclear efficacy along with limited tolerance and high costs are key concerns linked to immunoglobulin-based prevention strategies 48 Infections caused by staphylococci and Pseudomonas are the main focus of the nosocomial immunoglobulin pipeline 50 Vaccines 52 Long-lasting immunity is the key advantage of vaccines over other methods of prophylaxis 53 Setbacks include efficacy and implementation of vaccination in some key target populations 53 CHAPTER 3 STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS 56 Summary 56 Disease background - S. aureus causes a wide variety of infections, often initiated with commensal carriage of the pathogen 57 Treatment options - S. aureus resistance patterns determine the choice of drug 58 Resistance development - MRSA has become a crucial concern in both hospital and community 58 Epidemiology - elderly and surgical patients are the principal risk groups for S. aureus infection 64 Key risk groups 64 Epidemiology and spread of disease 64 Rationale for vaccine development - high incidence and increasing resistance levels drive interest in vaccines 65 Market potential - a large population would be eligible for vaccination across the 7MM 68 Target population and market opportunity 68 Patients undergoing planned surgery 71 Dialysis 74 Elderly aged 65 years and over 76 Others 78 Pipeline - StaphVAX failure dampens hopes for rapid launch of a S. aureus vaccine 78 Summary 78 StaphVAX (Nabi Biopharmaceuticals) 79 Product profile 79 Clinical trial overview 80 Datamonitor assessment 87 V710 (Merck & Co/Intercell) 88 Product profile 88 Clinical trial data 89 Datamonitor assessment 91 SA75 (VRI plc) 91 Product profile 91 Clinical trial data 92 Datamonitor assessment 93 Assessment of the overall potential of S. aureus vaccines - good prospects, but significant challenges remain 93 CHAPTER 4 STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS 96 Summary 96 Disease background - S. epidermidis is mainly associated with medical devices 96 Treatment options - many antibacterial drugs are active against S. epidermidis 97 Resistance development - resistance levels are comparatively low, but have been increasing 97 Epidemiology - patients undergoing implant surgery are at greatest risk of infection 98 Key risk groups 98 Epidemiology and spread of disease 98 Rationale for vaccine development - protection against the next potential ""superbug"" 99 Market potential - orthopedic, ophthalmic and cardiac surgery patients would benefit most from vaccination 101 Target population and market opportunity 101 Implant and device surgery 103 Dialysis 106 Pipeline - no competition for Nabi 108 Summary 108 EpiVAX (Nabi Biopharmaceuticals) 108 Assessment of the overall potential of S. epidermidis vaccines - a combination vaccine with S. aureus is the way forward 109 CHAPTER 5 PSEUDOMONAS AERUGINOSA 113 Summary 113 Disease background - P. aeruginosa causes a wide range of different infections 113 Treatment options - resistances set a limit on therapy approaches 115 Resistance development - increasing non-response to a large variety of drugs makes prevention a key interest 115 Epidemiology - P. aeruginosa is a critical pathogen in the ICU 116 Key risk groups 116 Epidemiology and spread of disease 117 Rationale for vaccine development - resistance is the key driver, but vaccine design will be challenging 120 Market potential - patients with severe respiratory diseases and those at risk of an ICU stay are key target populations 121 Target population and market opportunity 121 Cystic fibrosis patients 122 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 125 Patients undergoing planned surgery with subsequent pre-planned or highly likely ICU stay 127 Others 132 Pipeline - after many pipeline failures, IC43 looks promising 133 Summary 133 IC43 (Intercell) 135 Product profile 135 Clinical trial data 136 Assessment of the overall potential for P. aeruginosa vaccines 137 CHAPTER 6 CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE 140 Summary 140 Disease background - C. difficile causes severe diarrhea and colitis 140 Treatment - antibiotic drugs are available, but many patients relapse 142 Resistance development - emergence of strain 027 is associated with worse clinical outcomes 142 Epidemiology - the elderly are at greatest risk of C. difficile infection 143 Key risk groups 143 Epidemiology and spread of disease 143 The UK 144 The US 147 Germany 149 Economic burden 150 Rationale for vaccine development - high clinical need is the key driver 150 Market potential - annual peak sales exceeding $1.5 billion are realistic in the elderly population 151 Target population 151 Commercial opportunity 153 Initial market: people in institutionalized care 154 Long-term opportunity: vaccination of all people turning 65 156 C. difficile vaccines pipeline - no competition for Acambis in sight 158 Summary 158 C. difficile vaccine (Acambis) 158 Product profile 158 Clinical trial data 159 Datamonitor assessment 160 Assessment of the overall potential for C. difficile vaccines - C. difficile is a highly promising target for nosocomial vaccination 161 CHAPTER 7 ENTEROCOCCUS SPP. 163 Summary 163 Disease background - E. faecalis and E. faecium are key causes of enterococcal infections 163 Treatment - resistances have limited the efficacy of available antibiotic options 164 Resistance development - VRE is emerging as severe concern 164 Epidemiology - incidence and mortality of enterococcal infections are increasing 168 Key risk groups 168 Epidemiology and spread of disease 169 Rationale for vaccine development 170 Market potential - it will be hard to construct a viable cost-efficacy case for enterococcal vaccination 171 Target population and commercial opportunity 171 Pipeline - no clinical candidates are developed for enterococcal infections yet 173 Summary 173 Assessment of the overall potential for enterococcal vaccines - alternative prevention strategies have better potential 174 APPENDIX A 176 Bibliography 176 APPENDIX B 194 Report methodology 194 About Datamonitor 194 About Datamonitor Healthcare 194 About the Infectious Diseases analysis team 195 Key therapy team members 196 Holger Rovini, Head of Respiratory and Infectious Diseases 196 Hedwig Kresse, Senior Analyst, Infectious Diseases 196 Disclaimer 197 [Inhaltsverzeichnis ausblenden] |
||||||||||||
|
Table 1: Costs associated with nosocomial infections 20 Table 2: Antibodies against nosocomial infections pipeline, March 2008 51 Table 3: S. aureus - Annual incidence estimates of overall planned surgery and key subtypes in the 7MM, 2008 73 Table 4: S. aureus - Annual incidence estimates of dialysis in the 7MM, 2008 75 Table 5: S. aureus - elderly recurrent and total population sizes in the 7MM, 2008 (million) 77 Table 6: S. aureus vaccine pipeline, January 2008 79 Table 7: StaphVAX - product profile, 2008 80 Table 8: StaphVAX - end-stage renal disease trials, January 2008 82 Table 9: StaphVAX - orthopedic surgery trials, January 2008 83 Table 10: StaphVAX - cardiovascular surgery trials, 2008 83 Table 11: StaphVAX - lot comparison trial, January 2008 84 Table 12: V710 - product profile, 2008 88 Table 13: V710 - clinical trial overview, January 2008 90 Table 14: SA75 - Product profile, 2008 91 Table 15: S. epidermidis - annual incidence estimates of key types of orthopedic/ophthalmic surgery in the 7MM, 2008 105 Table 16: S. epidermidis - annual incidence estimates of key types of cardiac surgery in the 7MM, 2008 106 Table 17: S. epidermidis - annual incidence estimates of dialysis in the 7MM, 2008 107 Table 18: S. epidermidis vaccine pipeline, January 2008 108 Table 19: EpiVAX - Product profile, 2008 108 Table 20: P. aeruginosa - Annual incidence estimates of cystic fibrosis in the 7MM, 2008 123 Table 21: P. aeruginosa - prevalence estimates of different stages of COPD in the 7MM, 2008 126 Table 22: Breakdown of patients at elevated risk of ICU stay (median hospital stay >7 days) by type of procedure and admission in England, 2006 128 Table 23: Pseudomonas aeruginosa- total vaccination target population sizes (7MM) 131 Table 24: P. aeruginosa vaccines - overview of key bacterial targets and candidates, 2008 134 Table 25: P. aeruginosa vaccines - clinical pipeline, January 2008 135 Table 26: Estimated incidence of C. difficile infections across the 7MM 144 Table 27: C. difficile - total recurrent vaccination target population sizes in the 7MM, 2008 (million) 152 Table 28: C. difficile - commercial opportunity and cost-efficacy estimate for vaccination in people undergoing institutionalized care in the 7MM, 2008 155 Table 29: C. difficile - commercial opportunity for annual and cumulative catch-up vaccination in all elderly aged 65 and older in the 7MM, 2008 157 Table 30: C. difficile vaccine pipeline, January 2008 158 Table 31: C. difficile vaccine (Acambis) - product profile, 2008 159 Table 32: Enterococcal vaccine pipeline, January 2008 173 Figure 1: Number of deaths by leading cause of death in the US, 2004 10 Figure 2: Nosocomial infections -most common types of infection in the US, 2007 11 Figure 3: Estimated number of healthcare-associated infections by subpopulation and major site of infection in the US, 2002 12 Figure 4: Rates of healthcare-associated infections by subpopulation and major site of infection in the US, 2002 12 Figure 5: Origin of infection in ICU patients in the 5EU , 1992 13 Figure 6: Deaths associated with healthcare-associated infections in the US, 2002 14 Figure 7: Key ICU infections by causative pathogen in Germany, Spain, France, 2003/2005 15 Figure 8: Factors influencing the assessment of the market opportunity for nosocomial vaccination in the 7MM, 2008 19 Figure 9: Nosocomial infections - additional days spent in hospital by type of infection 21 Figure 10: Hospital costs, reimbursement and losses for central-line BSI and pneumonia - Allegheny General Hospital in the US, 2006 23 Figure 11: Drawbacks of antibiotic therapy and value-added of preventive strategies in nosocomial infections 34 Figure 12: Patient groups likely to benefit from different infection prevention strategies 35 Figure 13: Advantages and disadvantages of hygiene and infection control-based strategies in the prevention and control of nosocomial infections 37 Figure 14: Efficacy assessment of recommended preventive measures for the four most frequent types of nosocomial infection 40 Figure 15: Advantages and disadvantages of immunoglobulin-based strategies in the prevention and control of nosocomial infections 46 Figure 16: Advantages and disadvantages of vaccination strategies in the prevention and control of nosocomial infections 52 Figure 17: MRSA - hospital discharges mentioning MRSA in the US, 1993-2005 59 Figure 18: MRSA - hospital discharges per 100,000 population by age group in the US, 2004 60 Figure 19: MRSA - prevalence among all S. aureus infections in the 5EU, 1999-2006 61 Figure 20: MRSA -proportion of MRSA in ICUs versus other hospital departments in the 5EU, 2006 62 Figure 21: MRSA - incidence in Japan, 1999-2005 (sentinel reporting system) 62 Figure 22: S. aureus - incidence in the 5EU, 2001-06 (sentinel reporting) 65 Figure 23: S. aureus - sizing estimates of key target populations eligible for vaccination in the 7MM, 2008 69 Figure 24: Target group expansion model for S. aureus vaccination 71 Figure 25: S. aureus vaccine development - summary of drivers and resistors, 2008 94 Figure 26: S. epidermidis - sizing estimates of key target populations eligible for vaccination in the 7MM, 2008 103 Figure 27: S. epidermidis vaccine development - summary of drivers and resistors, 2008 111 Figure 28: P. aeruginosa - antibiotic resistance levels across Europe, 2006 116 Figure 29: P. aeruginosa - bacteremia laboratory reports in the UK, 1990-2004 (voluntary reporting) 118 Figure 30: P. aeruginosa - infections in Japan, 1999-2005 (sentinel reports from ~470 hospitals) 118 Figure 31: P. aeruginosa - infections in ICUs in Germany, 2000 and 2005 119 Figure 32: P. aeruginosa - sizing estimates of key target populations eligible for vaccination in the 7MM, 2008 122 Figure 33: P. aeruginosa - potential cost savings through vaccination in cystic fibrosis patients in the 7MM, 2003 124 Figure 34: P. aeruginosa vaccine development - summary of drivers and resistors, 2008 138 Figure 35: C. difficile infection - course of disease 141 Figure 36: Age and sex distribution of C. difficile reports in the UK, January-December 2006 (voluntary surveillance) 145 Figure 37: C. difficile reports for patients aged 65 years and over in the UK, 2000-06 (mandatory and voluntary reports) 146 Figure 38: Deaths related to C. difficile infection in England & Wales, 2001-06 147 Figure 39: C. difficile infections per 100,000 hospital discharges in the US, 1993-2003 148 Figure 40: Annual Clostridium difficile-related mortality rates per million population in the US, 1999-2004 149 Figure 41: C. difficile infections per 100,000 in-hospital patients in Germany, 2000-04 149 Figure 42: C. difficile - possible target group expansion strategy for recurrent opportunity in the 7MM, 2008 (million) 153 Figure 43: C. difficile - market opportunity for vaccination in the 7MM, 2008 154 Figure 44: C. difficile vaccine development - summary of drivers and resistors, 2008 162 Figure 45: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci among ICU patients in the US, 1995-2004 165 Figure 46: E. faecalis /E. faecium susceptibility to vancomycin in England and Wales, 1990-2005 166 Figure 47: E. faecium - vancomycin resistance in Europe, 2001-06 167 Figure 48: Enterococcal infections by age group in the UK, 2005 169 Figure 49: Enterococcal bacteremia reports by type in the UK, 2002-06 170 Figure 50: Enterococcal vaccine development - summary of drivers and resistors, 2008 175 [Tabellenverzeichnis ausblenden] |
||||||||||||
| Hinweis: | * Der Rechnungsbetrag für diese Studie wird in $ (Dollar) ausgewiesen. Kunden aus dem Inland bekommen von uns eine Rechnung in Euro, umgerechnet zum letztwöchigen Schlusskurs | |||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||


